Analisis Dampak Media Massa Terhadap Konflik Rohingya terhadap Respon Masyarakat Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v4i2.2263Keywords:
Framing, Mass Media, Rohingya ConflictAbstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of mass media coverage on the Rohingya conflict and how media framing influences the response of Indonesian society. Using a qualitative approach through documentation studies, this research examines reports from various prominent online media such as Kompas.com, CNN.com, Liputan6.com, Detik.com, and BBC Indonesia. The analysis results show that mass media play a strategic role in shaping public perception through different framings, ranging from humanitarian framing, human rights violations, to security and rejection aspects. The dominant humanitarian framing successfully increases empathy and solidarity among Indonesians toward Rohingya refugees, while negative framing has the potential to cause tension and rejection. Furthermore, the media also influence public opinion regarding government policies related to conflict management. This study emphasizes the importance of mass media in constructing balanced and responsible narratives to encourage constructive social responses and support human rights protection.
References
Alfriandi, D. (2024). Analisis isi framing berita konflik Israel dan Palestina di media Kompas.com. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 643, 643–654.
Altheide, D. L. (2007). The mass media and terrorism. Discourse & Communication, 1(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307079207
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Doubleday.
DeVito, J. A. (2016). The interpersonal communication book (14th ed.). Pearson.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Hafidli, M. N. (2023). Analisis framing model Robert Entman tentang kasus Kanjuruhan di Detik.com dan BBC News. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 178, 178–183.
Hidayat, P. L. (2025). Framing media pemberitaan pengungsi Rohingya dalam perspektif HAM di Majalah Tempo.co. Al-Tsiqoh: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Dakwah Islam, 19–38.
Islamiati, W., & Islamiati, A. (2022). Memahami konflik Palestina-Israel dalam bingkai berita NU Online. [Artikel tanpa nama jurnal; tambahkan bila tersedia].
Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press.
Knapp, M. L., Hall, J. A., & Horgan, T. G. (2014). Nonverbal communication in human interaction (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Laila, P. N. (2024). Analisis framing berita pengungsi Rohingya pada Liputan6.com dan Detik.com. Publicio: Jurnal Ilmiah Politik, Kebijakan dan Sosial, 6(2), 191–201.
Liputo, G. L. (2018). Analisis framing pemberitaan konflik Rohingya pada media online Kompas.com dan CNN.com. Acta Diurna Komunikasi. [Volume dan nomor tidak disebutkan, mohon lengkapi jika ada].
McQuail, D. (2020). McQuail’s mass communication theory (7th ed.). Sage Publications.
Paramitha, G. A. (2022). Analisis framing berita penembakan jurnalis AS di Ukraina pada CNNIndonesia.com dan Sindonews.com. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(5), 376–383.
Ramadani, M. S., Kurniawan, K., & Fuadin, A. (2024). Menguak bias media dalam pemberitaan konflik Israel-Palestina: Sebuah analisis konten kritis. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 887–905.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life (pp. 95–106). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
