Between Global Competition and National Justice: The Legal Protection Dilemma in Indonesia

Authors

  • T. Keizerina Devi Azwar Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Utary Maharany Barus Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v3i3.3297

Keywords:

ASEAN, Distributive Justice, Globalization, Legal Certainty, WTO Disputes

Abstract

This article examines Indonesia’s legal-protection dilemma amid intensifying global competition. Addressing a gap in prior literature that treats globalization’s legal effects descriptively, we evaluate the effectiveness of Indonesia’s legal protection through the lenses of legal certainty (Radbruch), distributive justice (Rawls), and institutional quality (North). Using a normative juridical method—statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches—our analysis of WTO-related disputes and domestic regulatory practice shows: First, persistent disharmony and overlap across trade, investment, and IPR regimes; Second, weak and uneven enforcement that erodes legal certainty; and Third, structural asymmetries in international fora impacting national justice goals. We propose targeted reforms: accelerated regulatory harmonization aligned with international commitments, capacity-building for trade-remedy and IPR enforcement, and calibrated safeguards for MSMEs within ASEAN and WTO frameworks. These steps reconcile competitiveness with national justice, strengthening Indonesia’s legal readiness in a globalized economy.

Author Biography

Utary Maharany Barus, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Jalan Universitas No. 4, Kampus USU, Medan

References

ASEAN Secretariat. (2015). AEC Blueprint 2025. Jakarta: ASEAN. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/AECBP_2025r_FINAL.pdf

Bosio, E. (2023). Critical global citizenship: Foucault as a complexity thinker, social justice, and the challenges of higher education in the era of neo-liberal globalization – A conversation with Mark Olssen. Citizenship, Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1386/ctl_00123_1

Chakraborty, G. (2022). Challenges before the institution of marriage in the era of globalization. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 13(1), 65–77. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ijlj13&div=9&id=&page=

Doing, M. (2016). Globalisasi dan pengaruhnya terhadap pembaharuan hukum ekonomi di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.1.2016.67-74

Doing, M. (2016). Globalisasi dan pengaruhnya terhadap pembaharuan hukum ekonomi di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.1.2016.67-74

Fosten, G. K. (2020). The challenges of increasing consumerism in Africa in the era of globalization: A systematic analysis employing consumerism theory. Africa and Globalization: Nov. Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55351-7_8

Goulard, S. (2024). Assessing the impact of the European Union-Indonesia-Malaysia palm oil dispute on trade and limitations for set-tlement. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 4(47), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.4(47).2024.46-55

Gu, M. (2018). Challenges and solutions faced by China’s teachers in the era of globalization. In Challenges Related to Professional Work Teaching (pp. 109–123). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372573_008

Kochetkov, M. V., & Avdeeva, E. A. (2018). Humanitarian “Reversing” in the education development in the Russian Federation education under the conditions of transhumanistic challenges in the era of globalization. In Challenges Related to Professional Work Teaching (pp. 109–123). https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.345

Marx, A. (2019). Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: Exploring their design and its impact on effectiveness. Sus-tainability, 11(4), art. 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041087

Mulisa, F. (2021). Challenges for African scholars in the globalization era: Contexts speak. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 923–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00651-3

North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

Nugroho, A. A. (2022). Perkembangan, penerapan, dan tantangan hukum anti-dumping di Indonesia ditinjau dalam kerangka hukum WTO. Dharmasiya, 2(3), 1075-1090. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1247&context=dharmasisya

Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2017, November). U.S. wins WTO dispute on Indonesia’s import restrictions on hor-ticultural and animal products. Press release. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2017/november/us-wins-wto-dispute-indonesia%E2%80%99s

Olasiuk, H. (2018). Innovations in the era of globalization: Challenges for the Indian economy. In Global Conundrum-Dark Clouds Behind Silver Lining (pp. 229–240). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1727-9_13

Pangestu, Y., Sipahutar, B., & Ardianto, B. (2021). Harmonisasi prinsip perdagangan internasional pada GATT dalam UU No. 7/2014 tentang Perdagangan. Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 2(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.22437/up.v2i1.10352

Phong, N. D., et al. (2018). Challenges for Vietnam in the globalization era. Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 9(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2018-0002

Pranoto, E. (2018). Pembangunan sistem hukum ekonomi Indonesia berlandaskan Pancasila di era globalisasi. Jurnal Spektrum, 15(1), 89-111. https://dx.doi.org/10.35973/sh.v15i1.1111

Putri, D. S., et al. (2023). Hukum Ekonomi Internasional: Tantangan dan peluang bagi Indonesia dalam era globalisasi. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(2), 1-11. https://journal.pubmedia.id/index.php/lawjustice/article/download/2052/2048/2439

Quddus, M. S. (2025). Analisis konvergensi hukum ekonomi internasional: Tantangan hukum bagi Indonesia dalam mengharmonisasikan kepentingan BRICS dan ASEAN. Equality: Journal of Law and Justice, 2(1), 62-88. https://doi.org/10.69836/equality-jlj.v2i1.264

Rasheed, N. (2022). Risk identification, assessment, and allocation in PPP: A systematic review. Buildings, 12(8), art. 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081109

Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture. London: SAGE.

Sanchez, D. A., & Gomez, A. (2014). Analysis of historical total production costs of cellulosic ethanol and forecasting for the 2020-decade. Fuel, 130(2), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.037

Saputro, G. (2020). Value clarification technique (VCT) models answered the challenge of demoralization in the face of globalization era 5.0. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453750

World Trade Organization Panel Report. (2004). Korea – Antidumping duties on imports of certain paper from Indonesia. Panel report, WTO. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds312_e.htm

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

T. Keizerina Devi Azwar, & Utary Maharany Barus. (2024). Between Global Competition and National Justice: The Legal Protection Dilemma in Indonesia. LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 3(3), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v3i3.3297

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.