Juridical Analysis of Contract Work Agreements For Honorary Employees and The Right To Obtain Employment and A Decent Livelihood For Humanity
(A Study of Honorary Employees In The Environment of Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v3i2.1480Keywords:
Decent Living, Employment Agreement, Juridical, Honorary, IncomeAbstract
The issue of contract workers emerged following the enactment of Law Number 5 of 2014 regarding State Civil Apparatus and Government Regulation Number 49 of 2018, which implied the termination of contract workers in government agencies. The objectives of this research are: 1. To understand the process and content of employment agreements signed by the parties, reviewed from a juridical aspect for contract workers in the ULM environment. 2. To determine the right to work and obtain decent income for humanity for contract workers in the ULM environment from a juridical aspect, and 3. To identify legal protection efforts for contract workers in ensuring future employment status in the ULM environment. This research is a normative legal study with a qualitative research paradigm. The research sample was randomly selected among contract workers to obtain credible data. Data collection techniques include documentary studies to gather legal materials, followed by interview techniques to gather empirical data. The results of the study found that the future employment status of contract workers is still unclear from the process and content of the employment agreement. However, contract workers still exist factually. The income earned by contract workers is still below the minimum wage standard due to the absence of regulations on remuneration and salary disbursement based solely on the financial budget capacity, resulting in income that is insufficient to meet the standard of decent living. Furthermore, legal protection efforts for contract workers were not found juridically related to the certainty of future employment. Based on the results of this study, it is recommended to various stakeholders to address the issue of the future status of contract workers working in government agencies in order to avoid social, political, legal, and economic upheavals, namely: (1) creating new regulations in the form of Government Regulations. Legal approaches to addressing contract worker issues are the best way to achieve justice and humanity. (2) every agency needs to take policy measures to address contract workers in the form of contract extensions while awaiting the issuance of Government Regulations (PP) governing the future employment status of contract workers. This is intended to provide certainty that can create a peaceful working environment for contract workers.
References
Adi Setyaningrum, N., et al. (2021). Kepuasan kerja, komitmen organisasi & turnover intention: Studi pada pegawai honorer di Kabupaten Grobogan. Jurnal EKOMAKS, Maret 2021.
Aditya Pramana Putera, M. (2016). Perlindungan hukum tenaga honorer setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jurnal Magister Hukum UDAYANA, 2016.
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Amnah Safitta, et al. (2022). Paradigma pemerintah terhadap upah guru honorer dalam perspektif hukum. Jurnal Pro Hukum Universitas Gresik, November 2022.
Antonius Ferry Bastian, et al. (2020). Tinjauan yuridis status hukum pekerja kontrak non PNS (honorer) berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan. ERA HUKUM: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2020.
Aqlia, A. N., & Wales, E. I. (2022). Analysis of the recruitment of non-PNS educators and education personnel in the state education unit. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 2(6), 916–923.
Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar tata hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Baiq, S. (2017). Kedudukan tenaga honorer berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jurnal IUS, 5(2), Agustus 2017.
Blustein, D. L., Kenny, M. E., Di Fabio, A., & Guichard, J. (2019). Expanding the impact of the psychology of working: Engaging psychology in the struggle for decent work and human rights. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 3–28.
Boeri, T. (2012). Setting the minimum wage. Labour Economics, 19(3), 281–290.
Braganza, A., Chen, W., Canhoto, A., & Sap, S. (2021). Productive employment and decent work: The impact of AI adoption on psychological contracts, job engagement and employee trust. Journal of Business Research, 131, 485–494.
Burgess, J., & Connell, J. (2006). Temporary work and human resources management: Issues, challenges and responses. Personnel Review.
Cahyaningsih, E., Silalahi, N. L. E., Noprisson, H., & Ayumi, V. (2021). One data ASN framework (ODAF) for Indonesian state civil apparatus. 2021 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS), 363–368.
Campbell, T., & Miller, S. (2006). Human rights and the moral responsibilities of corporate and public sector organisations (Vol. 20). Springer Science & Business Media.
Carr, S. C., Hodgetts, D. J., Potgieter, J., & Meyer, I. (2021). Macropsychology for decent work: Sustainable livelihood. Macropsychology: A Population Science for Sustainable Development Goals, 213–231.
Chui, W. H., & McConville, M. (2007). Research methods for law (Vol. 104). Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh.
Collins, H. (2010). Employment law. Oxford University Press.
Conley, J. M., O’Barr, W. M., & Riner, R. C. (2019). Just words: Law, language, and power. University of Chicago Press.
Danaher, J. (2016). Human enhancement, social solidarity and the distribution of responsibility. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(2), 359–378.
De Schutter, O. (2019). International human rights law. Cambridge University Press.
Dora, R. R. (2020). Analisa peran tenaga honorer terhadap efektivitas tugas aparatus sipil negara. Jurnal JAPS, 1(1), 2020.
Edwards, H. T. (1971). The developing labor relations law in the public sector. Duq. L. Rev., 10, 357.
Fadjar, A. M. (2006). Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta.
Febriana, S. K. T., Yulianti, I., & Istiqomah, E. (2023). Peran kepuasan kerja dalam memediasi ketidakamanan kerja terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis guru honorer di Indonesia. Psychopolytan: Jurnal Psikologi, 6(2), 32–40.
Ferraro, T., Dos Santos, N. R., Pais, L., & Mónico, L. (2016). Historical landmarks of decent work. European Journal of Applied Business and Management, 2(1).
Floridi, L. (2022). The European legislation on AI: A brief analysis of its philosophical approach. In The 2021 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab (pp. 1–8). Springer.
Frey, D. F. (2017). Economic growth, full employment and decent work: The means and ends in SDG 8. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(8), 1164–1184.
Gobel, R. T. S., Muhtar, M. H., & Suleman, Z. (2023). Coherence of the government’s policy agenda in the elimination of regional honorary teachers. Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022), 133–140.
Gumbel, J. M., & Hoover, J. (1990). Employment contracts: An option to consider. Labor Law Journal, 41(3), 175.
Hamidi, J. (2011). Hermeneutika hukum: Sejarah, filsafat, & metode tafsir. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Harasztosi, P., & Lindner, A. (2019). Who pays for the minimum wage? American Economic Review, 109(8), 2693–2727.
Hariyono, & Fadjar, A. M. (2013). Membangun negara hukum yang bermartabat. Kerjasama Setara Press (Kelompok Penerbit Intrans) dan Universitas Widyagama.
Harris, P. (2015). An introduction to law. Cambridge University Press.
Hart, H. L. A., Hart, H. L. A., Raz, J., & Green, L. (2012). The concept of law. Oxford University Press.
Holley, W. H., Jennings, K. M., & Wolters, R. S. (2011). The labor relations process. Cengage Learning.
Ikhsana Khusnul, et al. (2022). Analisis perlindungan hukum tenaga honorer berdasarkan Undang-Undang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Journal of Constitutional Law, 2(1), 2022.
Istiqlallia, N. F., & Aisyah, H. S. (2020). Law status of the government employee under work agreement according to the state civil arrangement of application in Indonesia. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(3), 1856–1864.
Kurnia, T. S. (2014). Konstitusi HAM: Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Pustaka Pelajar.
Lawless, R. M., Robbennolt, J. K., & Ulen, T. (2010). Empirical methods in law. Aspen Publishers New York.
MacNaughton, G., & Frey, D. F. (2010). Decent work for all: A holistic human rights approach. Am. U. Int’l L. Rev., 26, 441.
Mangesti, Y. A., & Tanya, B. L. (2014). Moralitas hukum. Genta Publishing.
Marbun, R. J., Ketaren, A. H., & Nurhayati, S. (2022). Government authority in regulating employment relations between employers and workers/laborers in Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 2(3).
Marzuki, I., & Faridy, F. (2020). Relevansi hukum dan hak asasi manusia dengan agenda reformasi: Dimensi nasional dan internasional. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 5(2), 350–359.
McConville, M. (2017). Research methods for law. Edinburgh University Press.
McGregor, L., Murray, D., & Ng, V. (2019). International human rights law as a framework for algorithmic accountability. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(2), 309–343.
Merrills, J. G., & Robertson, A. H. (2022). Human rights in Europe: A study of the European Convention on Human Rights. In Human rights in Europe. Manchester University Press.
Mertokusumo, S. (2014). Teori hukum (edisi revisi). Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 12.
Munir Fuady, D. S. H., & MH, L. L. M. (2014). Doktrin-doktrin modern dalam corporate law & eksistensinya dalam hukum Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nurtjahjo, H. (2005). Ilmu negara pengembangan teori bernegara dan suplemen.
Poe, S. C. (2019). The decision to repress: An integrative theoretical approach to the research on human rights and repression. Understanding Human Rights Violations, 16–38.
Putra, I. P. R. A., Tjukup, I. K., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2020). Legal protection of labor in employment for termination of employment due to the acquisition of the company. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(1), 36–55.
Ramli, L. (2020). Hukum ketenagakerjaan. Airlangga University Press.
Rhodes, M. (2015). Employment policy. In Policy-making in the European Union (pp. 293–318).
Rudman, R. (2013). New Zealand employment law guide (2013 Edition). CCH New Zealand Limited.
Russo, C. (2005). Legal research: An emerging paradigm for inquiry. Perspectives in Education, 23(1), 41–51.
Setiawan, D., Supriatna, S., & Joka, R. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap tenaga kerja kontrak honorer berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan. Krisna Law, 3(2), 1–13.
Simandjorang, B. M. T. V., & Kurniawan, A. (2022). Contextual bureaucratic reform in the recruitment system of the state civil apparatus of Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 599–617.
Sudrajat, T., Kunarti, S., & Hartini, S. (2019). Bridging the legal gap between open selection and internal selection of state civil apparatus promotion in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 255(1), 12053.
Sulaiman, S. (2018). Paradigma dalam penelitian hukum. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 255–272.
Thiede, B. C., Lichter, D. T., & Slack, T. (2018). Working, but poor: The good life in rural America? Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 183–193.
Watkins, D., & Burton, M. (2017). Research methods in law. Routledge.
Whitehouse, R. (2006). Staff and honorary members of the Institute. Archaeology International.
Zaeni, A. (2007). Hukum kerja: Hukum ketenagakerjaan bidang hubungan kerja. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
