Juridical Analysis of Violation of Core-Plasma Partnership Agreement of Palm Oil Plantation Between PT Hardaya Inti Plantation and Plasma Amanah Farmers Cooperative (Case Study of KPPU Decision No. 02/KPPU-K/2023)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i1.1999Keywords:
business competition, civil law, company control, economic justice, Inti-plasma partnershipAbstract
The inti-plasma partnership scheme in the oil palm plantation sector aims to create a mutually beneficial relationship between large companies (nucleus) and smallholders (plasma). However, in practice, there are often inequalities that cause plasma farmers to lose control over their businesses. This research analyzes the violation of the partnership agreement between PT Hardaya Inti Plantations (PT HIP) and Koperasi Tani Plasma Amanah as decided in KPPU Decision No. 02/KPPU-K/2023. The focus of the analysis includes the forms of juridical, financial, and operational control that PT HIP exercised over the cooperative, as well as the legal implications based on Jeremy Bentham's theories of civil law, competition, and justice. The results show that PT HIP has abused its dominant position by fully controlling the partnership agreement, limiting cooperatives' access to decision-making, and implementing non-transparent financial practices. KPPU has imposed administrative sanctions in the form of an agreement addendum obligation, an independent audit, and a fine of Rp1,000,000,000.00. However, an evaluation of this decision indicates that the sanction has not fully provided substantive justice for plasma farmers, given the absence of a direct compensation mechanism. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen regulations and implement more effective monitoring and law enforcement mechanisms to ensure fairer and more sustainable partnership relationships in the oil palm plantation industry in Indonesia.
References
Abdulkadir Muhammad. (2014). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Adonara, F. F. (2020). Perjanjian Kemitraan Di Bidang Ekowisata (Ecotourism) Sebagai Instrumen Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro, Kecil Dan Menengah (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Airlangga)
Alamanda, A. E., Mangar, I., Mutmainah, L., & Fajriyah, N. (2023). Perjanjian Pola Kemitraan Dalam Pelaksanaan Peremajaan Tanaman Kelapa Sawit. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 9(2), 488. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v9i2.3663
Amirudin & dll. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Andi Fahmi Lubis, dkk. (2017). Buku Teks Hukum Persaingan Usaha. KPPU.
Arif, M., & Busthami, D. S. (2022). Pengawasan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) pada Perjanjian Kemitraan Inti Plasma Kelapa Sawit Manajemen Satu Atap di Indonesia.
Bambang Sunggono. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bere, N., Pudjiastuti, A. Q., & Setiaji, J. (2024). Analisis Kinerja Kemitraan Inti Plasma Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Di Desa Jatiwaringin Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah (Performance Analysis Of The Core Plasma Partnership Of Palm Palm Plantations In Jatiwaringin Village, East Kotawaringin District, Central Kalimantan Province). Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Komunikasi Pertanian (Journal of Agribusiness and Agricultural Communication), 7(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.35941/jakp.7.2.2024.16767.141-150
Damaiyanti Sidauruk, G. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Dalam Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss1.art10
Dara Kospa, H. S. (2016). Konsep Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Tekno Global UIGM Fakultas Teknik, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36982/jtg.v5i1.223
Karina, G. D., & Kanggas, F. Z. H. (2023). Analisa Teori Keadilan John Rawls Dan Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Benthan Terhadap Konsep Pemenuhan Hak Korban Menurut Perspektif Viktimologi. 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v6i2.11194.
Malaka, M. (2014). Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha. 7(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.31332/aladl.v7i2.218
Pramesti, M. W. (2021). Good Governance Dalam Kemitraan Guna Melaksanakan Pelayanan Kesehatan Di Kota Semarang.
Pratiwi, E., Negoro, T., & Haykal, H. (2022). Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum? Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922
Ranti, R., Sakirah, S., Oddang, A., & Kamiruddin, K. (2024). Implementasi kemitraan contract farming model inti plasma dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam. Juremi: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, 4(1), 321-330
Santyningtyas, A. C., & Wanda, Z. N. (2021). Perspektif Undang-Undang Perkebunan Dalam Pengolahan Hasil Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Bagi Perusahaan Di Indonesia.
Setiawan, R. N. H. (2024). Monopoli Pada Industri Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit: Kajian Hukum Atas Perubahan Peraturan Kementerian Pertanian No.98/2013. 6(4).
Sinaga, R. S. (2011). Masalah Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Kemitraan Inti Plasma Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit (Studi Kasus Pada Pt. Shm Dengan Koperasi Pgh) Dan Tindakan Notaris Dalam Menghadapi Perjanjian Kemitraan Inti Plasma Dalam Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit.
Suharno, Yuprin A.D. (2020). Model Kemitraan Inti-Plasma Pada Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Rakyat Yang Dikelola Sepenuhnya Oleh Perusahaan Inti (Studi pada KUD Krida Sejahtera di Provinsi Lampung). Vol 14 No 1. https://doi.org/10.36873/aev.2020.14.1.24.
Tektona, R. (2022). Quo Vadis: Kepastian Hukum Aturan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 2(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.55869/kppu.v3i-.51
Topan, M., & Said, M. Y. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Petani Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Dalam Program Kemitraan Inti Plasma. 5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
