Evaluating the Planning and Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Senior High Schools

A CIPP-Based Case Study in Semarang, Indonesia

Authors

  • Hartono Hartono Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Hesti Pandu Wismasit Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Eti Yenik Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Endang Sri Darmayanti Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Ngurah Ayu nyoman Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i3.2736

Keywords:

CIPP evaluation, educational planning, Independent Curriculum, policy implementation, senior high school

Abstract

Educational planning plays a strategic role in guiding the success of policy implementation at the school level. This study aims to evaluate the planning and implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Senior High Schools in Semarang City using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product). A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings show that in the context aspect, schools demonstrate strong support for the new curriculum, although challenges remain in terms of understanding and infrastructure. In the input aspect, teachers were actively involved in curriculum development, yet training and technical assistance remain suboptimal. The process aspect reveals collaborative efforts among teachers, but the implementation of the Pancasila Student Profile projects and authentic assessment still face several obstacles. Meanwhile, in terms of product, teacher creativity and student participation have improved, although a comprehensive evaluation instrument for holistic learning outcomes is still lacking. These findings underscore the need to strengthen teacher training, reduce administrative burdens, and develop adaptive evaluation tools for future curriculum implementation.

References

S. Arikunto and C. S. A. Jabar, Evaluasi program pendidikan: Pedoman teoretis dan praktis bagi mahasiswa dan praktisi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2023.

D. L. Stufflebeam and G. Zhang, The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press, 2017.

UNESCO, “Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education,” 2022, UNESCO Publishing, Paris. [Online]. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707

A. Hargreaves and D. Shirley, Well-being in schools: Three forces that will uplift your students in a volatile world. ASCD, 2022.

P. Sahlberg, Finnish lessons 3.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?, 3rd ed. Teachers College Press, 2022.

A. C. Ornstein and F. P. Hunkins, Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues, 8th ed. Pearson Education, 2021.

G. Zhang et al., “Using the context, input, process, and product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs,” J. High. Educ. Outreach Engagem., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 181–200, 2020.

M. Fullan, “The right drivers for whole system success,” 2021, Centre for Strategic Education, Ontario. [Online]. Available: https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Right-Drivers-full-report.pdf

R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6th ed. SAGE Publications, 2018.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Hartono Hartono, Hesti Pandu Wismasit, Eti Yenik, Endang Sri Darmayanti, & Ngurah Ayu nyoman. (2025). Evaluating the Planning and Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Senior High Schools: A CIPP-Based Case Study in Semarang, Indonesia. LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 4(3), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i3.2736

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.