An Exploration of EFL Student’s Expectation in English Department
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i2.2289Keywords:
EFL Students, Expectations vs. Reality, English Department, Facilities, Learning EnvironmentAbstract
This study examines the gap between students' expectations and the reality of their learning experience in an EFL university setting. While students anticipate adequate facilities, a well-structured curriculum, and a supportive English-speaking environment, they often face inadequate resources, curriculum mismatches, and limited immersion. This disparity affects motivation, academic performance, and language proficiency. By identifying these gaps, the study offers insights for improving teaching strategies, curriculum development, and the overall EFL learning environment. This qualitative case study explores the gap between students' expectations and the reality of EFL learning in the English Education Department. Semi-structured interviews with three students from different academic levels provide diverse perspectives. Thematic analysis identifies key discrepancies in facilities, curriculum relevance, and the English-speaking environment. Expert validation ensures the validity of interview questions. Findings highlight the need for institutional improvements to enhance students' learning experiences. This study explores the gap between English Education students' expectations and reality, impacting their learning. Key issues include inadequate facilities, a theory-heavy curriculum, and a lack of English use in daily communication, leading to reduced motivation and proficiency. Institutions must improve facilities, balance theory with practice, and foster an English-speaking environment to better prepare future educators.
References
[1.] C. Romney and D. V. Holland, “The vulnerability paradox: Strengthening trust in the classroom,” Manage. Teach. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 84–90, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1177/2379298120978362.
[2.] A. Nuray and O. Ceylan, “The relationship between learner autonomy and motivation,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. (TOJET), vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 150–158, Oct. 2021.
[3.] A. Silvola, P. Näykki, A. Kaveri, and H. Muukkonen, “Expectations for supporting student engagement with learning analytics: An academic path perspective,” Comput. Educ., vol. 168, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104192.
[4.] A. Tomlinson, A. Simpson, and C. Killingback, “Student expectations of teaching and learning when starting university: a systematic review,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1054–1073, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2023.2212242.
[5.] B. Mash and J. Edwards, “Creating a learning environment in your practice or facility,” South Afr. Fam. Pract., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.4102/safp.v62i1.5166.
[6.] B. Thornhill-Miller et al., “Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education,” J. Intell., vol. 11, no. 3, p. 54, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11030054.
[7.] H. D. Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th ed. Pearson Longman, 2007.
[8.] H. Tamsah, J. Bata, I. Sekolah, T. Ilmu, E. Amkop, and Y. Yusriadi, “Create teaching creativity through training management, effectiveness training, and teacher quality in the Covid-19 pandemic,” J. Ethn. Cult. Stud., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 18–35, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejecs/800.
[9.] I. Mauliya, R. Z. Relianisa, and U. Rokhyati, “Lack of motivation factors creating poor academic performance in the context of graduate English department students,” Linguists: J. Linguist. Lang. Teach., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 73, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.29300/ling.v6i2.3604.
[10.] I. S. P. Nation and J. Macalister, Language Curriculum Design. Routledge, 2010.
[11.] J. C. Richards and R. Schmidt, Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4th ed. Routledge, 2010.
[12.] J. Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching, 5th ed. Pearson Education, 2015.
[13.] M. Lamb and F. E. Arisandy, “The impact of online use of English on motivation to learn,” Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn., vol. 33, no. 1–2, pp. 85–108, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1545670.
[14.] M. Takrim and R. H. Mikkael, “Pengaruh kompetensi dosen, motivasi, dan lingkungan belajar terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah Bahasa Inggris,” Economics and Digital Business Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 100–111, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.37531/ECOTAL.V1I2.14.
[15.] S. Inganah, R. Darmayanti, and N. Rizki, “Problems, solutions, and expectations: 6C integration of 21st century education into learning mathematics,” JEMS: J. Edukasi Mat. Sains, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 220–238, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.25273/JEMS.V11I1.14646.
[16.] Z. Dornyei, Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
