An Analysis Of Three Curriculum Approaches In Teaching English At Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/pustaka.v3i4.678Keywords:
Curriculum Approaches, Teaching English, Three Curriculum ApproachesAbstract
This research aims to find out the differences and explain the 3 curriculum approaches. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with library research methods. The data collection technique is to collect several references, such as books, articles, and other related sources. Then the data analysis techniques used in this study are content analysis, with stages of data display, data reduction, data verification, and conclusion . In this study using qualitative research. The data analysis method used in this research is descriptive qualitative method. The results showed there is no best approach to curriculum design, and that forward design, central design and backward design may each work well but in different circumstances. Each approach has advocates and practitioners who can cite examples of their successful implementation. They may also work simultaneously in some circumstances.
References
ASLAN, 2019. Hidden Curriculum. Cv. Pena Indis.
Asrial, A, Syahrial, S, Kurniawan, D. A, Subandiyo, M, Amalina, N, 2019. Exploring Obstacles in Language Learning among Prospective Primary School Teacher. Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ.
Bin-Tahir, S. Z, Suriaman, A., 2019. Designing English syllabus for multilingual students at pesantren schools.
Brunner J, 1966. The Process of Education. Camb. MA Harv. Educ. Press.
Cahyono, B.Y, Widiati, U, 2011. The Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia.
Celce-Murcia, M, 1991. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.
Challenor, J, Ma, M, 2019. A review of augmented reality applications for history education and heritage visualisation.
Clark, J., 1987. Curriculum Renewal in School Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 49–90.
Docking R, 1994. Competency-based curricula – the big picture.
Dou, A. Q, Chan, S. H, Win, M. T., 2023. Changing visions in ESP development and teaching: Past, present, and future vistas. Front. Psychol.
Dubin, F, Olshtain, E, 1986. Course Design: Developing Programs and Materials for Language Learning.
Fan, L., 2022. Action Research in Foreign Language Teaching in China.
Freeman D, 1996. Redefining research and what teachers know. In: Bailey K, Nunan D (eds) Voices from the Language Classroom. N. Y. Camb. Univ. Press.
Gacs, A, Goertler, S, Spasova, S, 2020. Planned online language education versus crisis‐prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Lang. Ann.
Graves K, 2008. The language curriculum: a social contextual perspective. Language Teaching.
Han, K., 2021. Fostering students’ autonomy and engagement in EFL classroom through proximal classroom factors: autonomy-supportive behaviors and student-teacher relationships. Front. Psychol.
Hassan, K. I, Gao, X., 20221. Communicative Language Teaching in Malaysian ESL Context: A Qualitative Exploration into In-service Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. Int. J. TESOL Stud.
Khair, U, Misnawati, M., 2022. Indonesian language teaching in elementary school: Cooperative learning model explicit type instructions chronological technique of events on narrative writing skills from interview texts. Linguist. Cult. Rev.
Korotchenko, T. V., Matveenko, I. A, Strelnikova, A. B, Phillips, C, 2015. Backward design method in foreign language curriculumdevelopment. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci.
Krahnke, K, 1987. Approaches to Syllabus Design in Foreign Language Teaching.
Leung C, 2012. Outcomes-based language teaching. In: Burns A, Richards JC (eds) The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University.
Mackey WF, 1965. Language Teaching Analysis. Lond. Longman.
Millimouno, T. M, Delamou, A, Kourouma, K, Kolié, J. M, Béavogui, A. H, Roegiers, S, Delvaux, T., 2021. Outcomes of blended learning for capacity strengthening of health professionals in Guinea. BMC Med. Educ.
Misnawati, M, Poerwadi, P, Veniaty, S, Nurachmana, A, Cuesdeyeni, P, 2022. The Indonesian Language Learning Based on Personal Design in Improving the Language Skills for Elementary School Students. Multicult. Educ.
Mumba, C, Mkandawire, S. B., 2019. The Text-based Integrated Approach to Language Teaching: Its Meaning and Classroom Application. Multidiscip. J. Lang. Soc. Sci. Educ.
Munby J, 1978. Communicative Syllabus Design. Camb. Camb. Univ. Press.
Murray, P, 1993. Curriculum Development and Design Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Murtiningsih, T, Amelia, R., 2023. Designing an English Syllabus for Architecture Students: Matching Students’ English Skills and Future Jobs. SALEE Study Appl. Linguist. Engl. Educ.
Nkemleke, D, Belibi, E. P, 2019. Strategies for enhancing learners’ language competence with special reference to Cameroon. Syllabus Rev. Spec. Focus APCCBA.
Pennington MC, Richards JC, 1997. Re-orienting the teaching universe: the experience of five first-year English teachers in Hong Kong. Language Teaching Research.
Richards, J. C., 2013. Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design.
Ruzhekova-Rogozherova, B. T., 2022. BACKWARD EFL AND ESP CURRICULUM DESIGN: THE CASE OF THE NEW EFL AND ESP CURRICULUM FOR PHD STUDENTS AT THE TODOR KABLESHKOV UNIVERSITY OF TRANSPORT. Mech. Transp. Commun.-Acad. J.
Shobirin, M., 2016. Konsep dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar. Deepublish 19.
Stenhouse L, 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. Lond. Heinemann.
Stufflebeam D, McCormick C, Brinkeerhoff R, Nelson C, 1985. Conducting Educational Needs Assessment. Hingham, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Su, J, Zhong, Y, Ng, D. T. K., 2022. A meta-review of literature on educational approaches for teaching AI at the K-12 levels in the Asia-Pacific region. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell.
Taba H., 1962. Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York:Harcourt Brace and World.
Trim J., 1987. Some Possible Lines of Development of an Overall Structure for a European Unit/Credit Scheme for Foreign Language Learning by Adults. Sytrasbourg: Council of Europe. 9.
Van Slyke, R. D, Armstrong, N. J, 2020. Communities serve: a systematic review of need assessments on US veteran and Military-Connected populations. Armed Forces Soc.
Wiggins G, McTighe J, 2006. Understanding by Design: A Framework for Effecting Curricular Development and Assessment. Alexandria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 15.
Wijaya, M. B. R, Suwahyo, S., Kurniawan, A, Kurniawan, M, Nugroho, A. Y, Satyawiguna, T, 2022. Application of Competency Test Materials Standard Motorcycle Business Techniques with SKKNI Level II Scheme Standards for Excellent and Competitive Vocational High Schools Graduates. 4th Vocat. Educ. Int. Conf.
Wilkins DA, 1976. Notional Syllabuses. Oxf. Oxf. Univ. Press.
Willis J, 1996. A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Harlow Longman.
Yalden, j, 1987. The Communicative Syllabus.
Zaky, H., 2018. Phenomenological and humanistic psychology: Formulating adult education instructional system to increase ESL learners’ autonomy. J. Psychol.
