Presuppositions and Common Ground in Utterances Between Characters With Social Class Issues in the Crazy Rich Asians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/pustaka.v5i4.3437Keywords:
Common Ground, Conversation Analysis, Presupposition, Qualitative Study, Social ClassAbstract
Crazy Rich Asians is a romantic comedy movie that raises the theme of social class. The issue of social class can be found by observing the context and utterances of the speakers and interlocutors in the movie. This study aims to identify, analyze, and describe the types of presuppositions and common ground in the conversations between the characters in the Crazy Rich Asians movie with of social class issue in it. So that the meaning contained in the speech between the characters in it can be conveyed well. This study uses a qualitative method with a note-taking method as a data collection method. Where data is obtained by observing the utterances between the characters in the movie. The data will then be analyzed using matching techniques, and the results are presented descriptively. The results of the study showed 15 which have been analyzed data contained presuppositions. The data is divided into one existential presupposition, four factual presuppositions, four lexical presuppositions, four structural presuppositions, one non-factual presupposition, and one counterfactual presupposition. In this study, presuppositions analyzed are inseparable from the issue of social class.
References
Afriandini, S. (2021). Presuposisi serta pengetahuan bersama dalam movie Midnight Sun tahun 2018 yang disutradarai oleh Scott Speer. Universitas Pakuan.
Berger, P. (1980). Invitation of sociology: A humanistic perspective. New York, NY: Doubleday Company.
Chu, J. M. (2018). Crazy Rich Asian. Amerika Serikat: SK Global Entertainment.
Jucker, A. H., & Smith, S. W. (1995). Explicit and implicit ways of enhancing common ground in conversations. International Pragmatics Association, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.1.01juc
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Liang, R., & Liu, Y. (2016). An analysis of presupposition triggers in Hilary Clinton's first campaign speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p68
Mulyana, M. Y. (2005). Kajian wacana: Teori, metode & aplikasi prinsip-prinsip analisis wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiaa Wacana.
Nababan, P. W. (1987). Ilmu pragmatik (teori dan penerapannya). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Peccei, J. S. (1999). Pragmatics. London: Taylor & Francis Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203255773
Pratiwi, I. B. (2021). Analisis presuposisi dalam movie Harriet. Universitas Pakuan.
Rahardi, K. (2020). Konteks pragmatik dalam perspektif cyberpragmatics. Linguistik Indonesia, 38(2), 151–163.
Saifudin, A. (2019). Konteks dalam studi linguistik pragmatik. LITE Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Budaya, 14(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.33633/lite.v14i2.2323
Sinaga, D. P., & Harahap, N. H. (2020). Praanggapan dalam pidato Obama pada APEC CEO Summit 2014. Jurnal Ilmiah Kohesi, 1–7.
Sugiyono. (2014). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suseno, F. M. (2001). Pemikiran Karl Marx, sosialisme utopis ke perselisihan revisi onsme. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Toft, M., & Jarness, V. (2020). Upper-class romance: Homogamy at the apex of the class structure. European Societies, 23(1), 2–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1823009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 PUSTAKA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





