Faktor Pendorong Sekolah Menengah Baru di Era Zonasi: Analisis Peluang dan Tantangan di Kota Jayapura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/pustaka.v5i4.3405Keywords:
driving factors, educational transformation, new schools, zoning era, zoning systemAbstract
The implementation of the zoning system since 2017 has triggered significant transformation in the secondary education landscape in Jayapura City, including the emergence of new secondary schools as a response to policy changes. This study aims to analyze the factors that trigger the proliferation of new secondary schools in Jayapura City during the zoning era and identify the opportunities and challenges that accompany it. Using a qualitative approach with case study methods, this research involved in-depth interviews with 35 key informants including education providers, local government, and community representatives, as well as analysis of licensing documents and educational statistics data for the 2017-2024 period. The results showed a significant increase in the number of secondary schools in Jayapura City from 68 units in 2017 to 89 units in 2024, representing growth of 30.9%. The main factors triggering the emergence of new schools include: limited capacity of existing schools within the zoning system, profitable education business opportunities due to excess demand, demands for geographical equity in education access particularly in peripheral areas, resistance to the zoning system from upper-middle economic groups seeking quality alternatives, and diversification needs for specialized education programs. Identified opportunities include improved access to education in underserved areas, increased infrastructure investment totaling Rp 189.5 billion, and healthy competition driving educational innovation. Main challenges include quality disparities between schools, potential fragmentation of the education system, operational sustainability issues affecting 14.3% of new schools, and shortage of 546 qualified teaching staff. The research recommends the need for stricter regulations on the establishment of new schools, comprehensive accreditation systems, and integration strategies for new schools in a sustainable zoning education ecosystem that ensures equitable access to quality education.
References
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill.
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dinas Pendidikan Kota Jayapura. (2024). Statistik pendidikan Kota Jayapura tahun 2024. Dinas Pendidikan Kota Jayapura.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.
Hakim, L., & Mulyani, S. (2023). Proliferasi sekolah swasta dalam era zonasi: Studi kasus di Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Kebijakan Pendidikan Indonesia, 16(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.21831/jkpi.v16i2.48765
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Panduan implementasi sistem zonasi penerimaan peserta didik baru. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Statistik pendidikan Indonesia tahun 2024. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi.
Kurniawan, A., & Sari, D. P. (2022). Dampak sistem zonasi terhadap dinamika pendirian sekolah menengah swasta di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Management, 9(3), 278-294. https://doi.org/10.21831/ijem.v9i3.45213
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
Pratiwi, N. K., & Setiawan, R. (2023). Kualitas pendidikan sekolah menengah baru dalam sistem zonasi: Evaluasi komprehensif. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(3), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.21009/JEP.0113.08
Rahman, S., Hidayat, T., & Sartika, D. (2022). Strategi sustainability sekolah swasta dalam menghadapi dinamika sistem zonasi. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Swasta, 7(4), 312-328. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v7i42022p312
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Rosyid, M. A., & Anggraini, L. (2023). Fragmentasi sistem pendidikan: Dampak tidak diinginkan dari proliferasi sekolah swasta era zonasi. Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan, 15(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsp.2023.152.156-174
Talen, E. (2001). School, community, and spatial equity: An empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3), 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00254
Wardani, K., & Sari, M. (2022). Respons stakeholder pendidikan terhadap implementasi sistem zonasi di daerah tertinggal. Journal of Educational Policy and Development, 10(2), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.21831/jepd.v10i2.41567
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 PUSTAKA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
