The Effect of Memory Game on Reading Comprehension Skill of Eighth Grade Students at UPTD SMP Negeri 3 Mandrehe

Authors

  • Linda Mariani Gulo Universitas Nias
  • Yaredi Waruwu Universitas Nias
  • Afore Tahir Harefa Universitas Nias
  • Riswan Zega Universitas Nias

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i3.3067

Keywords:

Eighth Grade Students, Learning Motivation, Memory Game, Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Retention

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of using a memory game as a teaching medium on the reading comprehension skills of eighth-grade students at UPTD SMP Negeri 3 Mandrehe. A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent pretest-posttest design was implemented with 60 purposively selected students, who were divided into two groups: a control group and an experimental group. The control group received conventional teaching methods, while the experimental group was taught using a memory game from the Interacty platform. Data were collected through multiple-choice reading comprehension tests administered before and after the treatment. The results were analyzed using paired and independent sample t-tests as well as N-Gain calculations to measure the improvement in reading comprehension skills. The analysis revealed that the experimental group showed a significantly higher improvement in reading comprehension, with an N-Gain score of 0.792 (high) compared to the control group’s 0.244 (low). The findings indicate that memory games effectively enhance vocabulary retention, increase student motivation, improve focus, and create an engaging classroom atmosphere. By incorporating memory games, students became more actively involved in learning, which contributed to improved reading comprehension skills. The study concludes that memory games are a valuable tool for improving reading comprehension and fostering an enjoyable and meaningful learning experience. Therefore, it is recommended that memory games be integrated into junior high school English instruction as an innovative teaching strategy to enhance students’ reading skills. The research highlights the potential of interactive and engaging methods in facilitating language learning, thus suggesting that educators should consider adopting such approaches to improve educational outcomes in reading comprehension.

References

1. Alvi, M. H. (2016). A manual for selecting sampling techniques in research. Munich Personal RePEC Archive, 1–56.

2. Ardiansyah, F., & Jaya, A. (2007). Extending the students’ narrative text comprehension through reading SMART protocol. Journal of English Study Programme, 7(3), 13.

3. Aulina, C. N. (2012). Pengaruh permainan dan penguasaan kosakata terhadap kemampuan membaca permulaan anak usia 5–6 tahun. Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v1i2.36

4. Bishara, S. (2024). Predicting reading comprehension by reading level and diglossia: A comparison between diglossic first grade students with and without learning disabilities. Online Submission, 3(1), 1–13.

5. Blank, F. (2024). Most spoken languages in the world in 2024. Lingua.Edu. https://lingua.edu/the-most-spoken-languages-in-the-world/

6. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610

7. Chall, J. S. (2000). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.

8. Cheng, S. T., Hiong, S. J., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2024). Integrating HOTs in reading comprehension in inclusive classrooms: Implications from a dyslexia study. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 13(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.14425/jice.2024.13.2.1205

9. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experiments: Nonequivalent control group designs.

10. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

11. Daulay, S. H. (2021). Developing vocabulary by educational game.

12. EF EPI. (2024). EF English Proficiency Index. EF. https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/

13. Ika, D., Pratiwi, A., Soesyasmoro, R. A., Wicara, T., Kesehatan, P., & Surakarta, K. (2024). Hubungan antara working memory dengan reading comprehension pada siswa kelas 4 di SDIT Cahaya Hati. Jurnal Teknologi Widyabhakti, 3(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.59686/jtwb.v3i1.136

14. Indonesia, E. E. (2024). Skor geografis. EF English Proficiency Index, 3. https://www.ef.com/epi

15. Larasaty, G., & Sulastri, A. (2019). Improving students’ reading comprehension using learning cell technique. Journal of English Language Learning (JELL), 1–9.

16. Lay Hoon, L., & Mohd Embros, N. (2020). The effect of reading strategy on comprehension achievement in Chinese language. Muallim Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 4(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/71

17. Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya keterampilan belajar di abad 21 sebagai tuntutan dalam pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v12i1.5813

18. Masita, E., Volya, D., Anggraini, D., Susilawati, A. K. D. D., Abrar, M., Ulfiati, L., Masbirorotni, N. A., Effendi, S., Rahmah, & Fajaryani, N. (Eds.). (2024). Kurikulum Merdeka dan pengajaran bahasa Inggris di era digital (1st ed.). PT Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup. https://repository.unja.ac.id/66661/1/Kurikulum%20Merdeka%20dan%20Pengajaran%20Bahasa%20Inggris%20di%20Era%20Digital-WITH%20COVER.pdf

19. Mukhlis, M., Asnawi, A., Afdal, A., & Junaidi, F. (2024). Kemampuan literasi membaca siswa di SMK Pusat Keunggulan Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26737/jp-bsi.v9i1.5297

20. Nasution, Z. (2022). Warming-up for reading as a strategy for EFL classrooms. Journal Language League, 12(2), 1–7.

21. Nevyta, D. D., Purba, L., & ... (2023). Efektivitas permainan memori matching card terhadap peningkatan kosa kata (Wortschatz) bahasa Jerman siswa kelas XI SMA YP HKBP Pematang Siantar. Jurnal Insan Pendidikan, 1(4), 74–83. https://journal.widyakarya.ac.id/index.php/jipsoshum-widyakarya/article/view/1625

22. Nuryadi, Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., & Budiantara, M. (2017). Dasar-dasar statistik penelitian (1st ed.). SIBUKU Media.

23. Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2014). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044538

24. Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., Morady Moghaddam, M., & Rad, E. (2024). The effect of interactive games on English language learners’ reading comprehension and attitudes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09883-9

25. Pane, W. S. (2022). Students perception toward descriptive review activity on extensive reading class of English Department of Widya Gama Mahakam University. Jurnal Pendas Mahakam, 7(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.24903/pm.v7i1.1070

26. Petrikovičová, L., Ďurinková, A., Králik, R., & Kurilenko, V. (2021). Methodology of working with a textbook versus field activities of teaching geography during the corona crisis. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(2), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.428

27. Putra, A. S., Tiatri, S., & Sutikno, N. (2017). Peningkatan kapasitas working memory melalui permainan congklak pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Psikologi, 44(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.21984

28. Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi pembelajaran abad 21 dan penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082

29. Risyani, S., Sihotang, J. K., Prastia, A. L., Putra, A., & Fahlapi, R. (2024). Perbedaan sistem pendidikan Indonesia dengan negara-negara di Asia Tenggara. Educational Journal: General and Specific Research, 4(2), 343–350.

30. Saraswati, P. (2024). Memory games and academic performance. Mathews Journal of Psychiatry & Mental Health, 9(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.30654/MJPMH.10046

31. Siswandi. (2018). Proses pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di SMP Negeri Pekanbaru Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sosial, Sains dan Humaniora, 4(1), 395–412.

32. Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.

33. Supriyadi, S., Hamdani, D., & Furqon, Y. M. (2018). Rancang bangun alfabet memory game menggunakan linear congruent method (LCM). JEJARING: Journal of Technology and Informatics Management, 3(1), 1–8.

34. Syerlita, R., & Siagian, I. (2024). Dampak perkembangan revolusi industri 4.0 terhadap pendidikan di era globalisasi saat ini. Journal on Education, 7(1), 3507–3515. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i1.6945

35. Wahyudi, A. Y. (2025). Kurikulum Merdeka dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris: Transformasi pendidikan di Indonesia. FSIP Teknorat. https://fsip.teknokrat.ac.id/penerapan-pembelajaran-bahasa-inggris-dalam-kurikulum-merdeka/?

36. Wulandari, A., Dasna, I. W., & Wonorahardjo, S. (2019). The effectiveness of contextual-based instructional materials of elements of group 15 for inorganic chemistry. JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran), 26(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.17977/um047v26i12019p028

37. Yonathan, D., Susandi, & Arifin, Y. (2021). Designing memory game for learning healthy life. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 670–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.054

Downloads

Published

2025-08-22

How to Cite

Linda Mariani Gulo, Yaredi Waruwu, Afore Tahir Harefa, & Riswan Zega. (2025). The Effect of Memory Game on Reading Comprehension Skill of Eighth Grade Students at UPTD SMP Negeri 3 Mandrehe. LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 4(3), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i3.3067

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.