Addressing the Global Deforestation Problem through the EU Deforestation Regulation and Producing Countries' Adaptation Processes

Authors

  • Glorya Evanglica Gala Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Suryo Sakti Hadiwijoyo Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
  • Petsy Jessy Ismoyo Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i3.2555

Keywords:

Deforestation, Green-Theory, PEST-Analysis, Producing-Countries, Trade-Regulations

Abstract

The European Union's awareness of the importance of forest protection and conservation has led to the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which strictly regulates trade in commodities and products that contribute significantly to deforestation and forest degradation. In response to the establishment of this regulation, objections were raised by producer countries of related commodities and products, including Brazil, Ghana, and Indonesia. Therefore, this study will examine the responses and adaptation processes of Brazil, Ghana, and Indonesia to the implementation of the EUDR and analyze the handling of global deforestation through the EUDR from the perspective of Robyn Eckersley's green theory. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach, utilizing data collection techniques through a literature review of various relevant studies. PEST analysis is used to review the political, economic, social, and technological impacts of the EUDR on producing countries. The results show that Brazil, Ghana, and Indonesia have adopted national approaches in preparing for EUDR implementation. The establishment of the EUDR is a commendable innovation in minimizing environmental damage through binding regulations; however, it is insufficient in reducing global deforestation rates, as these regulations only control access to the European Union market. Examining the EUDR from the perspective of green theory reveals that these regulations remain predominantly human-centric, and their formation process is not ideal based on the fundamental aspects outlined in green theory. Reviewing the impact of the EUDR on political, economic, social, and technological aspects in producer countries underscores the need for EU support for these countries, given the various challenges they face in the adaptation process, even though this regulation encourages more sustainable agricultural practices.

References

Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif.

Afandi, F. A., Suryaningtyas, P., & Feryanto. (2024). Strategi perkebunan Indonesia dalam menghadapi European Union on Deforestation-free Regulation (EUDR). Direktorat Kajian Strategis dan Reputasi Akademik IPB University, 6(3).

Besliu, R. (2024). EU deforestation regulation: Balancing climate action and global trade challenges. Green European Journal, 1–6. https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/eu-deforestation-regulation-balancing-climate-action-and-global-trade-challenges/#:~:text=Countries like Côte d’Ivoire,twice the size of Germany

Eckersley, R. (2013). Green theory. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (3rd ed., pp. 266–281). Oxford University Press.

European Commission. (2024, December 12). Application of EUDR regulation on deforestation-free products delayed until December 2025. Trade – European Commission. https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/news/application-eudr-regulation-deforestation-free-products-delayed-until-december-2025

European Forest Institute. (2024b). EUDR technical workshop: How is Ghana and EU preparing for the EUDR implementation in the cocoa sector?

European Parliament Council of the European Union. (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023. Official Journal of the European Union, 2023(May), 206–247. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32023R1115

European Union. (n.d.). The Sustainable Cocoa Initiative. https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/policies/programming/programmes/sustainable-cocoa-initiative_e

FAO. (2018). Terms and definitions: FRA 2020. Forest Resources Assessment Working Paper No. 188. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/en/

Forest Declarations Assessment. (2023). Article 1: Deforestation. https://dashboard.forestdeclaration.org/indicator-search/?_sft_assessment-theme=overarching-forest-goals

Forest Insight. (2024). Indonesia ready to present forest data in response to EUDR. https://forestinsights.id/indonesia-ready-to-present-forest-data-in-response-to-eudr/

Forest Trends. (2002). Ilegal deforestation for forest risk commodities dashboard: Brasil, Oktober, 1–26. https://www.forest-trends.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Tanzania-FRC-Dashboard-2.pdf

Grabbe, H., & Moffat, L. L. (2024). Extra time for deforestation: Lessons for future EU environmental legislation – Executive summary. Policy Brief 28/2024. Bruegel. https://www.bruegel.org/policy-brief/extra-time-deforestation-lessons-future-eu-environmental-legislation

Global Forest Watch. (2023a). Brazil. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/BRA/?map=eyJjYW5Cb3VuZCI6dHJ1ZX0%3D

Global Forest Watch. (2023b). Ghana deforestation rates & statistics. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/GHA/

Global Forest Watch. (2023c). Dashboard country: Indonesia. https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/IDN/

KAKIŞIM, C. (2022). Avrupa Yeşil Mutabakati: Yeşil teori perspektifinden bir analiz. Stratejik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30692/sisad.1064799

Kalischek, N., Lang, N., Renier, C., Daudt, R. C., Addoah, T., Thompson, W., Blaser-Hart, W. J., Garrett, R., Schindler, K., & Wegner, J. D. (2023). Cocoa plantations are associated with deforestation in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. Nature Food, 4(5), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00751-8

Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2024). Gelombang penolakan terhadap pemberlakuan The European Union on Deforestation-free Regulation (EUDR). https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5723/gelombang-penolakan-terhadap-pemberlakuan-the-european-union-on-deforestation-free-regulation-eudr

Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. (2024b). Terinspirasi langkah Indonesia, like-minded countries termasuk Amerika Serikat suarakan penundaan dan perubahan kebijakan EU Deforestation-Free Regulation (EUDR). https://www.ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5722/terinspirasi-langkah-indonesia-like-minded-countries-termasuk-amerika-serikat-suarakan-penundaan-dan-perubahan-kebijakan-eu-deforestation-free-regulation-eudr

Lopes, C. L., Chiavari, J., & Segovia, M. E. (2023). Brazilian environmental policies and the new European Union regulation for deforestation-free products: Opportunities and challenges. Climate Policy Initiative. https://www.climatepolicyinitiative.org/id/publication/brazilian-environmental-policies-and-the-new-european-union-regulation-for-deforestation-free-products-opportunities-and-challenges/

Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil. (2024). Resposta oficial do Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil. https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/nota-oficial-1

OEC. (2023a). Country profile: Brazil. https://oec.world/en/profile/country/bra

OEC. (2023b). Country profile: Ghana. https://oec.world/en/profile/country/gha

OEC. (2023c). Country profile: Indonesia. https://oec.world/en/profile/country/idn

Rasbin. (2023). Dampak UU anti deforestasi Uni Eropa terhadap ekspor Indonesia. Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI. https://puslit.dpr.go.id

Søndergaard, N., & Dias de Sá, C. (2023). Brazilian stakeholder assessment of the European deforestation regulation. Brasília–São Paulo: Agricultural Policy Dialogue Brazil–Germany (APD). https://www.apdbrasil.de

Trading Economics. (2023). Indonesia exports by category. https://tradingeconomics.com/indonesia/exports-by-category

Valencia, G. E., Cardenas, Y. D., & Acevedo, C. H. (2018). PEST analysis of wind energy in the world: From the worldwide boom to the emergent in Colombia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1126(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012019

Vasileva, E. (2018). Application of the PEST analysis for strategic planning of regional development. In 49th International Scientific Conference Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Economics (pp. 223–229).

Wahyuni, H., & Suranto, S. (2021). Dampak deforestasi hutan skala besar terhadap pemanasan global di Indonesia. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v6i1.10083

Winter, S., Zahnen, J., Schwarzer, L., & Al, E. (2024). Umsetzung der EU-Verordnung für entwaldungsrate Rohstoffe und Produkte (EUDR): Faktencheck und Erläuterungen.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Gala, G. E., Hadiwijoyo, S. S., & Ismoyo, P. J. (2025). Addressing the Global Deforestation Problem through the EU Deforestation Regulation and Producing Countries’ Adaptation Processes. LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities, 4(3), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.56910/literacy.v4i3.2555

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.